List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Elements describe the essential outcomes. | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. |
1 | Prepare for work | 1.1 | Identify work requirements |
| 1.2 | Identify and control hazards |
| 1.3 | Coordinate with appropriate personnel |
|
2 | Prepare pipelines for inspection/ testing | 2.1 | Plan and prepare for inspection of pipeline coating to procedures |
| 2.2 | Identify pipeline location to determine workplace hazards |
| 2.3 | Consult appropriate personnel to ensure the work is coordinated effectively with others involved on the work site |
| 2.4 | Obtain tools and equipment needed to carry out the work to procedures and check for correct operation and safety |
|
3 | Inspect and test pipeline coatings | 3.1 | Visually inspect pipeline coatings to determine condition and location of irregularities |
| 3.2 | Test pipeline as required to ensure system conforms to required operating parameters |
| 3.3 | Take action, as required |
| 3.4 | Report and record information related to status and any irregularity/deviations to procedures |
|
4 | Prepare pipeline surface and repair coating | 4.1 | Isolate work area to enable repair to proceed to procedures |
| 4.2 | Prepare the pipeline surface to receive the coating repair material using appropriate methods |
| 4.3 | Recoat the pipeline to procedures and test the repair area |
|
5 | Notify completion of work | 5.1 | Ensure worksite is clean and waste material is disposed of correctly to procedures and legislative requirements |
| 5.2 | Inform the control centre of the outcome of repairs and any abnormal situations |
| 5.3 | Return pipeline system to normal service to procedures if safe to do so |
| 5.4 | Notify work completion, incidents and irregularities to procedures |
|
6 | Compile and analyse reports | 6.1 | Collect and compile repair and operational data into accepted reporting format |
| 6.2 | Take action, as required |
| 6.3 | Ensure reports provide an accurate and ongoing record of deviations in the performance of the pipeline system |
| 6.4 | Utilise information or reports for short and long-term control planning |
Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria, and include the ability to:
undertake inspections and tests
recognise early warning signs of equipment needing attention or with potential problems
determine the most likely cause of routine problems and take action to ensure a timely return to full performance
distinguish between causes of problems/alarm/fault indications, such as:
variations in coating thickness
instrument failure/wrong reading
protective coating system characteristics
incorrect interpretation of safety data sheets (SDS) information
operational problems
complete forms and documentation
prepare and analyse reports related to the equipment/systems
determine work specifications from procedures and diagrams.
Evidence must be provided that demonstrates knowledge of:
all items on a schematic of the pipeline system and functions of each
types and applications of surface coating materials and their composition
routine and non-routine repair techniques
various coating inspection and test requirements
regulatory framework
organisation procedures, including those covering:
safety, emergency and hazard control
work permit systems
communications
environmental management
standard operating procedures (SOPs)
hierarchy of control.
The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.
The collection of performance evidence:
should occur over a range of situations which include typical disruptions to normal, smooth operation of an operating plant
will typically include a supervisor/third-party report or other evidence, focusing on consistent performance and problem recognition and solving. A supervisor/third-party report must be prepared by someone who has a direct, relevant, current relationship with the person being assessed and who is in a position to form a judgement on workplace performance relevant to the unit of competency
must include monitoring/maintenance of an actual industrial pipeline, the use of appropriate industrial item/s of equipment requiring demonstration of operation, start-up and shutdown procedures and responding to problems
may use industry-based simulation for part only of the unit where safety, lack of opportunity or significant cost is an issue.
Assessment should occur in operational workplace situations. Where this is not possible, or where personal safety or environmental damage are limiting factors, assessment must occur in a sufficiently rigorous simulated environment reflecting realistic operational workplace conditions. This must cover all aspects of workplace performance, including environment, task skills, task management skills, contingency management skills and job role environment skills.
Assessment in a simulated environment should use evidence collected from one or more of:
walk-throughs
pilot plant operation
demonstration of skills
industry-based case studies/scenarios
‘what ifs’.
Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence (provided a record is kept) or through an independent process, such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews (provided a record is kept).
Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.
Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.
The regulatory framework will be reflected in workplace policies and procedures and is not required to be independently assessed.
Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.
Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator.
In addition, the assessor or anyone acting in subject matter expert role in assessment must demonstrate both technical competency and currency. If the assessor cannot demonstrate technical competency and currency they must assess with a subject matter expert who does meet these requirements.
Technical competence can be demonstrated through one or more of:
relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment
appropriate workplace experience undertaking the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
appropriate workplace experience supervising/evaluating the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
Currency can be demonstrated through one or more of:
being currently employed undertaking the type of work being assessed
being employed by the organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed and having maintained currency in accordance with that organisation’s policies and procedures
having consulted/had contact with an organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed within the last twelve months, the consultation/contact being related to assessment
conducting on-the-job training/assessments of the type of work being assessed
being an active member of a relevant professional body and participating in activities relevant to the assessment of this type of work